示例 A｜新客户 / D2B 客户
目标：不是推销，而是帮助对方“快速选对”
适用场景
- LinkedIn 刚加好友
- 展会后第一次跟进
- 冷邮件 / 半冷邮件
- 终端品牌方、非专业采购
核心策略
- 不介绍公司历史
- 不直接报价
- 先输出「选型逻辑 + 专业判断」
电子邮件
主题
How brands usually choose the right custom tumbler (quick guide)
Hi {{Name}},
When brands look for custom tumblers,
most problems don’t come from pricing —
they come from choosing the wrong structure at the beginning.
Based on recent projects, buyers usually focus on three key factors:
- Usage scenario – internal gifts, marketing giveaways, or retail resale
- Material & finish – how it affects durability, branding, and perceived value
- Customization limits – logo position, color constraints, MOQ trade-offs
We recently helped a tech company simplify this decision by visualizing
different combinations before production, which reduced back-and-forth
and sped up internal approval.
If helpful, I can share a simple interactive example showing:
- how different choices change the final result
- what usually causes delays or hidden costs
No sales pitch — just a clearer way to evaluate options.
Best regards,
{{Your Name}}
为什么这封信有效？
- 新客户不怕信息少，怕选错
- 你在做的是：
👉 “帮我把复杂决策变简单” - XR / 不被直接提，但已埋好入口
示例 B｜老客户 / 专业买家
目标：不是再卖产品，而是“赋能他的业务”
适用场景
- 合作过但久未下单
- 老客户价格敏感
- 贸易商 / 渠道商 / 专业采购
- “最近没需求”的客户
核心策略
- 不促单
- 不强调产品优势
- 提供「可反复使用的工具价值」
电子邮件
主题
We built a tool that helps your customers decide faster.
Hi {{Name}},
We’ve been working on something recently that might be useful for your customers.
Instead of sending images, PDFs, or long explanations,
we created a way for buyers to:
- view different tumbler options clearly
- understand logo placement & finish impact
- make decisions without long back-and-forth
Some of our partners are using this as a free service tool
when talking to their downstream clients — not to sell harder,
but to make discussions easier.
If you’d like, I can show you how it works
and see whether it fits your current workflow.
No obligation — just sharing something that’s been working well.
Best regards,
{{Your Name}}
为什么这封信能激活沉睡客户？
- 老客户的第一反应不是“要不要买”
-
而是：
👉 “这个能不能帮我更好服务客户？” - 你从供应商 → 能力支持者
对照总结，策略差异
| 项目 | 新客户 / D2B | 老客户 / 专业买家 |
|---|---|---|
| 邮件目标 | 降低选择难度 | 提供工具价值 |
| 核心内容 | 选型逻辑、决策结构 | 可复用能力 |
| 是否报价 | ❌ 不报价 | ❌ 不报价 |
| 是否介绍公司 | ❌ 极少 | ❌ 不需要 |
| Xorder / XR 角色 | 理解工具（隐形） | 赋能工具（后台） |
总结
前述的2封示例是给启发和参考，可以根据实际情况进行调整优化。利用好新的能力，给客户带去新的价值，也给自己创造更多的新机会。
EDM 不是用来“推产品”的，
而是用来“让对方更容易做决定”的。
< 返回专题页封面